Friday, November 04, 2005

Continuing with the current theme of Feminism

Check out Norway. I applaud the parliamentarians for their protest, but check out the bottom of the page "a new law will demand that at least 40 percent of members on company boards are women." OUCH! Talk about a backward leap!

THINGS THAT ARE SWEET

Glue in the news. Between the guy in Home Depot and the guy suing his ex ... That Elmer's Glue cow is hanging her head in shame.

Also sweet, living in Wisconsin. Why? 'Cause I'm going to get me a clone!

Thursday, November 03, 2005

Banning Feminist Books

Neatly tying together the topics of two recent Internet discussions I participated in (Banned Books at The Ockhamist and Feminism on Ryan Thompson's Blog) comes this little item of joy from the AFP. It seems that Spain is putting the kibosh on the distribution of "Girl's Guides" aimed at 11-18 year olds as they are concerned that the guide "incites the practice of homosexuality among girls not sufficiently mature to have any kind of sexual relations."

Kismet! In a relatively short time I have discussed banning books and the Feminist movement and now here is an article on Spain banning a book from their schools because it promotes extremist feminist ideology.
I am most curious about any thoughts anyone might have on this.

THINGS THAT ARE SWEET
So, I am playing around with having "Things that are Sweet" become a permanent fixture. If I run out of things that are sweet I'll just stop doing it.
At any rate, today's thing that is sweet is: Scripted Television Reality Tie-ins.

ABC's Lost is planning on releasing a book written by a dead passenger of the crashed plane at the same time the manuscript is uncovered on the show. I am not an obsessive Lost fan, but many of the people out there are and will likely buy the book to search for clues to the show (which I am sure they will find since the fictional fiction's plot seems to parallel one of the subplots on the show) Now THAT is what I call marketing.
Along similar lines The West Wing is trying to bolster flagging ratings with *shock* interesting television. This Sunday the Democratic Nominee, Santos (Played by Jimmy Smits) and the Republican Nominee, Vinick (Played by Alan Alda) will participate in a live, loosely scripted debate. I think this is just setting the stage for a national vote for the next president of the NBC show. The only thing that could make this not sweet is if more people vote in the fictional election I think is coming than voted in the last Presidential election.

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

Things that are SWEET

From the AP

Man vs. Beast: Battle to the Death

Romantic Mice

and finally

From ACS News Today

Kiddies on a bender!

Tuesday, November 01, 2005

Feminism

One of the most popular topics in the 'blog-o-sphere is the battle of the sexes. It can be found in one form or another in nearly every 'blog post but occasionally becomes much more blatant. Recently I have been seeing, again, a burst of posts much more directly related to the sexes and their relationship to each other.
Now, my own view of feminism and the feminist movement is that feminists are challenging the long held notion that women are, by definition, inferior to men.
I am a great believer in equal pay for equal work and I believe that women are no more "completed" by motherhood than men are "completed" by fatherhood.
So much of the battle of the sexes seems to be rooted in the idea that there must be a superior sex. Over and over the underlying theme appears to be that for the world to function one sex must be inferior to the other and that because women have not proven themselves to be the superior sex they must by definition be the inferior sex.
So much of this doggerel is, I think, a holdover from a bygone era. Not too long ago in the course of human history women were less capable of providing support and sustenance for themselves and their families. Less upper body strength meant that in a world where things were most often accomplished by brute strength women were at a decided disadvantage in the work place.
Along came the industrial revolution and suddenly women became a much more viable option in the workforce.
I may be just a silly, stupid woman, but for me the feminist movement was (and is) about drawing attention to the fact that in today's fully automated workplace (there are a few exceptions) women are equal to men in every way and society should reflect this equality. As a woman I have no expectation of social equality and true workplace equality happening overnight, but I do have hope that, as the rate of social change increases due to ease of communication, it will happen soon.

This all does have a relationship to, well, relationships. I see no reason why, if I am as capable as a man and his equal, I should be inferior to him in a romantic relationship.

Why should I be romantically subservient? Why am I wrong to want the same things from life as my husband, brother, friend or father wants?

I have never gotten a satisfactory explanation as to why in a romantic relationship someone must be subordinate. Please, someone explain this to me.

Completely Random News Wrap Up

Have you ever wanted to take a wasps' nest, cram it into a hornets' nest, shove that whole thing into a bee hive, give it a good swift kick and then hang around and see what happens? Something tells me that Cook County Judge Jeffrey Lawrence has had just that impulse.

IN OTHER NEWS
With the Gang of 14 and the Dems with their Alito Fillibuster and the Republicans with their Nuclear Option the whole situation in the Senate is giving me giggle fits.

In Personal News
The Halfway House Girls welcome a new generation. Emma Jean Watts was born early this morning. Momma, Baby and Daddy are all doing fine. Pictures have been promised so keep checking The Halfway House 'Blog for updates!